search.phpsearch.phpsearch.phpsearch.phpsearch.phpsearch.phpsearch.phpsearch.phpsearch.php
 
 

Poster un nouveau sujetRépondre au sujet
index.phpindex.php
14/07/2018, 04:18
hfy962464
Membre



Inscrit le: 28 Juin 2018
Messages: 150

The San Francisco Giants beat the St. John Paxson Jersey . Louis Cardinals 6-4 in a back and forth contest in Game 4 of the NLDS from AT&T Park in San Francisco. The Giants now have a 3-1 series lead and can move on to the World Series with a victory tomorrow in Game 5. The Giants scored three times in the sixth inning off relief pitcher Marco Gonzales and Seth Maness to take the lead. The first two runs were scored by balls that didnt leave the infield followed by Buster Posey hitting a two-out single to record his third RBI of the evening. Cardinals rookie Kolten Wong hit his third home run of the playoffs - a solo shot in the third - to give his team the three run advantage. Posey and Hunter Pence each hit two-out RBI singles in the bottom half of the inning to pull the Giants back within one run. Matt Adams hit a RBI single in the first inning that scored Matt Carpenter to give the Cardinals the early advantage. That lead was short lived though as Posey hit a sacrifice fly in the bottom half of the inning to tie the game. A.J. Pierzynski gave St. Louis their lead back in the second when he hit a RBI single that scored Wong. Shelby Miller was the starting pitcher for St. Louis while Ryan Vogelsong started for San Francisco. Vogelsong lasted just three innings, allowing four earned run on seven hits with a pair of walks and a lone strikeout. Miller went 3 2/3 innings, allowing three earned runs on six hits with two walks and three strikeouts. Yusmeiro Petit picked up the win while Gonzales was stuck with the loss. Santiago got the save. Cards catcher Yadier Molina was not in the lineup for a second straight game due to a strained oblique. Tony Kukoc Jersey . The veteran fighter will be squaring off with Henderson in a five-round lightweight bout as part of another network televised card at the United Center on Saturday night. Custom Chicago Bulls Jerseys . LaQuinton Ross scored 17 of his 20 points in the first half, hitting his first four 3-pointers, to send No. http://www.shopbullsonline.com/ . The 25-year-old Lu, a regular on the Japan LPGA Tour after giving up her LPGA Tour membership in 2010, shot an 8-under 64 in windy, wet conditions at Kintetsu Kashikojima.Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.ca. Hello Mr. Fraser, Im watching ?the Toronto/San Jose game on Thursday and Im pretty sure that I just watched a blatant violation of an official rule. On the second goal at about 9:00 in the first period, officially awarded to Patrick Marleau, Matt Nieto drives the net going after the puck behind James Reimer and hits Reimers right pad with his stick and then ?Reimers pad pushes the puck is. This apparently is okay according to Rule 69.6 (I think) which says that if its incidental contact with the goalie in the crease, a goal that results is perfectly legal. On the other hand, 69.3 says that if a goal results from a player making contact with the goalie inside the crease, incidental or not, the goal is disallowed. It seems to me that the goal shouldnt count but it did. Am I missing something or is that correct? Cheers, Joe McLaughlin Joe, This is not a good goal as reported by referee Brad Watson following video review but more appropriately described as a dirty goal. The goal was credited to Patrick Marleau because he was the last San Jose Sharks player to touch the puck before the pad of James Reimer propelled the puck into the net. At least the player most responsible for the goal, Matt Nieto was credited with an assist after he contacted the puck on a one-touch pass in the neutral zone to Marleau. The reason Nieto wasnt credited with the goal is because he did not legally propel the puck into the net with his stick or by a deflection off his body. Rule 78 credits a goal in the scoring records to a player who shall have propelled the puck into the opponents goal. A goal shall be scored when the puck shall have been put between the goal posts by the stick of a player of the attacking side. The rule also states that a goal shall be scored if the puck is put into the goal in any way by a player of the defending side and the player of the attacking side who last touched the puck is credited with the goal. Two rules are potentially at play here, Joe, that in my judgment, should negate this goal. First, I do not believe the incidental contact application found in Rule 69.6 would apply. It states that in a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a resullt thereof will be allowed. Robin Lopez Jersey. Nieto was not, by his actions, playing a loose puck. I doubt very much that he even saw the puck that was positioned behind the right pad and between the legs of Reimers butterfly set. Nieto deliberately struck and pushed Reimers lower pad and skate. This was a net crash on the goalkeeper that caused the puck to cross the goal-line. The actions of Nieto are more appropriately described in the spirit and intent of the second paragraph of Rule 69.6 that says, In the event that a goalkeeper has been pushed into the net together with the puck after making a stop, the goal will be disallowed. I say spirit and intent because while the force exerted by Nieto to Reimers pad was sufficient to cause the puck to be propelled into the net but the goalkeeper was not. If a common sense extension of this segment of the rule is too much for anyone to envision, the language found in Rules 69.1 and 69.3 offer more clear evidence as to why this potential goal should have been disallowed. The smoking gun is found in Rule 69.1. The rule states that goals should be disallowed if an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his crease. For purposes of this rule, contact, whether incidental or otherwise, shall mean any contact that is made between or among a goalkeeper and attacking player(s), whether by means of a stick or any part of the body. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or review. Disallowing this goal is further supported by the specific language contained in Rule 69.3 (Contact Inside the Goal Crease) as you suggested, Joe. From his position behind the net, referee Watsons initial instinct was to wave off the goal. Something obviously didnt smell right for him as he looked through the back of Reimer and Nazem Kadri. The ref immediately looked for input from the other members of the officiating crew. A decision to allow the goal must have resulted from that conference. Since video replay is unable to rule upon a potential violation of goalkeeper interference, their only input on this play was to establish that the puck entered the net, hence the good goal terminology. General managers, please provide the referees with the capability to more accurately determine the presence of goalie interference through a video monitor located in the penalty box. Your team just might be recipients of the next dirty goal that is allowed unjustly. NFL Jerseys From China Wholesale NFL Jerseys Discount Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Jerseys NFL China NFL Jerseys Wholesale ' ' '

Répondre en citant
index.phpindex.php
14/07/2018, 04:18
Publicité







PublicitéSupprimer les publicités ?


Poster un nouveau sujetRépondre au sujet
index.php
index.php
Index | faire son forum | Forum gratuit d’entraide | Annuaire des forums gratuits | Signaler une violation | Conditions générales d'utilisation